CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19) RESOURCE CENTER Read More

CA SB 899

Title: Protective orders: firearms.
Author: Catherine S. Blakespear

Summary
SB 899, as introduced, Skinner. Protective orders: firearms. Existing law prohibits a person subject to specified protective orders from owning a firearm or ammunition. Existing law requires a person subject to those orders to relinquish any firearms or ammunition they own.This bill would require the court, when issuing those orders, to provide the person subject to the order with information on how any firearms or ammunition still in their possession are to be relinquished, as specified. The bill would require the court to review the file to determine whether the receipt has been filed and inquire as to whether the person has complied with the requirement. The bill would require violations of the firearms or ammunition prohibition to be reported to the prosecuting attorney in the jurisdiction where the order has been issued within 2 business days of the court hearing unless the restrained party provides a receipt showing compliance at a subsequent hearing or by direct filing with the clerk of the court.This bill would also require the court, at a noticed hearing relating to these orders, to consider information presented that the restrained person has possession or control of a firearm or ammunition. The bill would authorize the court, upon making this finding, to set a review hearing, as specified, to determine whether the person has possession or control of a firearm or ammunition in violation of the above provisions.Existing law requires a family court to determine the best interest of the child for purposes of deciding child custody in proceedings for dissolution of marriage, nullity of marriage, legal separation of the parties, petitions for exclusive custody of a child, and proceedings under the Domestic Violence Prevention Act. Existing law establishes a rebuttable presumption that an award of sole or joint physical or legal custody of a child to a person who has perpetrated domestic violence is detrimental to the best interest of a child and establishes factors to be considered in rebutting that presumption, including that the perpetrator is restrained by a domestic violence prevention order and has, or has not, complied with that order.This bill would additionally establish, as a factor to be considered, whether the perpetrator is restrained by any other protective order and has, or has not, complied with that order.The bill would, for specified protective orders if the respondent declines to relinquish possession of a firearm or ammunition based on the assertion of the right against self-incrimination, authorize the court to grant use immunity for the relinquishment of the firearm.

Status
Set for hearing March 12.

Bill Documents
CA SB 899 - 03/20/24 - Amended Senate
03/20/24 - CA SB 899 (03/20/24 - Amended Senate)


CA SB 899 - 02/27/24 - Amended Senate
02/27/24 - CA SB 899 (02/27/24 - Amended Senate)

CA SB 899 - 02/27/24 - Amended Senate
02/27/24 - CA SB 899 (02/27/24 - Amended Senate)

CA SB 899 - 01/03/24 - Introduced
01/03/24 - CA SB 899 (01/03/24 - Introduced)

CA SB 899 - 01/03/24 - Introduced
01/03/24 - CA SB 899 (01/03/24 - Introduced)

Add To Favorites

Author Details


  • Catherine Blakespear - D
    Senator - State Senate - CA

    Contact this Senator
    Visit their Website

    Contact Tips

    Capital Address:
    1021 O Street, Suite 7340
    Sacramento, CA 95814
    9166514038

    District Address:
    24031 El Toro Rd Ste 201A
    Laguna Hills, CA 92653 3151
    Phone: 9495985850